Question

I'm trying to work out the best way to approach this (3rd year undergraduate) essay titled in the form "What does it mean to argue that X?", and I'm having difficulty expressing a case for what it means to argue something as opposed to just presenting the argument itself. Is there any sense in which we can discuss the meaning of an argument independent of the contents of the argument itself?

Answer 1

When approaching an essay about the meaning of argumentation, the student can discuss techniques and strategies used in argumentation, the role of persuasion, and the importance of logical reasoning. They can explore how effective arguments are built on a clear claim and supported by evidence. The essay should go beyond a mere information dump and engage with the subject matter.

Step-by-step explanation:

When approaching an essay titled "What does it mean to argue that X?", the student is being asked to explore the meaning of argumentation itself, rather than just presenting an argument.

While arguments are typically about the content and evidence used to support a position, it is possible to discuss the meaning and purpose of arguments independent of their specific content.

This can involve examining the techniques and strategies used in argumentation, understanding the role of persuasion, and considering the importance of logical reasoning.

For example, the student can discuss how effective arguments are built on a clear claim or thesis statement, supported by relevant evidence. They can also explore the use of rhetoric and reasoning to persuade readers about the validity and worthiness of a specific position.

Additionally, they can delve into the idea of arguments going beyond a mere information dump by presenting a unique perspective and engaging with the subject matter.