Question

Why can’t we define 'necessary' tighter, by making it include empirical evidence of such a statement?

Everything that is agreed to be necessarily can be empirically verified. For example, if we put two twos together, we get 4, and we can empirically verify this by putting two sets of 2 sweets together and getting four.

Answer 1

In philosophy, empirical evidence is used to test the validity and truth of a proposition, but it doesn't provide certainty. While empirical evidence can support and verify a statement, there are some claims that cannot be empirically proven or disproven.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is discussing the concept of defining 'necessary' by including empirical evidence. In philosophy, empirical evidence is used to test the validity and truth of a proposition.

However, the use of empirical evidence does not provide certainty, but rather support and verification to a certain degree. While empirical evidence can be valuable in confirming the truth of a statement, it is not always possible to empirically prove or disprove certain claims.