Final answer:
There is no definitive philosopher's view on poems since perspectives vary widely. However, it's widely accepted that an informed analysis of a poem includes understanding both its textual evidence and poetic devices to truly appreciate its meaning and craftsmanship. Poetry analysis often reflects the individual reader’s background, yet remains grounded in the text’s substance.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question, "What is the philosopher's view on poems?" probably intends to ask about a more general perspective on poetry rather than a specific philosopher's view. It could be related to what poets or theorists believe about the nature and purpose of poetry. There is no one unifying philosopher's view on poems; different philosophers, critics, and poets have different opinions on the subject. However, analyzing poetry is a way to achieve an informed appreciation of the poem and to understand the craftsmanship and stylistic techniques that create meaning. When analyzing poetry, it's not just about identifying poetic devices but understanding their effects on music and meaning.
Poetry is a form of expression that can be interpreted differently due to the reader's unique backgrounds and experiences. Despite this, interpretations should always be supported by the text itself. While the statement that "all poems are responses to old poems" acknowledges the intertextual nature of literature, the point about "reading poems is just misreading them" highlights the idea that each reading is a re-interpretation. The notion that "overanalyzing poems is unnecessary" speaks to the belief in some circles that the emotional and immediate response to poetry may be as valuable as a deeply analytical one.