Question

I know the question some how tricky if not even boring, but the other day during a conference about Guido Reni and Caravaggio’s Saint Peter a group of scholars were discussing if a philological reading of the two painting were more correct over the contemporary look and perception of them. In particular someone argued that the Caravaggio’s Saint Peter was too theatrical and therefore it was lacking of authenticity. From my personal point of view the crucifixion of Caravaggio was way more authentic compared to Reni’s very harmonic mannerism: the tilted cross in the act of being put in place,Peter’s feet already covered with blood, Peter’s struggle as if he was fighting against his punishers, the almost random point of view… and so on….this made me think about how the overall discourse about authenticity is somehow nonsensical and how it could be reduced to a discourse over the intention of the artist. In caravaggio the intention is to represent reality while in Reni is to represent divine harmony…but still this explanation is not satisfying me, still even if boring the question of authenticity in art some how eludes a comprehensive explanation. What you think?reni caravaggio

Answer 1

The authenticity of art is a complex topic, especially when comparing Caravaggio's theatrical realism to Guido Reni's harmonious representation of divine subjects. Caravaggio's Crucifixion of Saint Peter, with its use of tenebrism and strong emotional impact, confronts the viewer with a raw, honest presentation of humanity, while Reni strives for pristine perfection.

Step-by-step explanation:

The authenticity of art, particularly in discussing works by Caravaggio and Guido Reni, can provoke varied scholarly debate. The struggle with such a notion lies in evaluating whether the physical and emotional realness depicted transcends to represent an authentic experience or interpretation of religious narratives. Caravaggio, known for his secular approach to religious art, incorporated tenebrism and dramatic realism in his works, such as in the Crucifixion of Saint Peter, presenting the humanity and suffering of figures directly to the viewer. This stark and theatrical realism contrasts with Reni's harmonious and divine approach, suggesting that authenticity might be a relative concept, rooted in the intention of the artist and the impact on the viewer, rather than a universal standard.

In the Crucifixion of Saint Peter, Caravaggio uses strong diagonal lines, muted colors, and masterful lighting to highlight the anguish and physical exertion in the act of crucifixion. He intends to capture a moment in time, emphasizing St. Peter's pain and the tension of the scene. On the other hand, Reni's works aim to depict divine harmony and an idealized beauty which correspond to a different artistic intent, presenting a more tranquil and balanced depiction of religious figures and narratives.