Question

Does philosophy rely on intuitions? If so, and all of philosophy comes down to intuition, how can one person be deemed to be more rational than other? In this world, most would agree that you cannot be certain of anything, apart from your own experience. Thus for basically anything else, there is a certain level of faith involved in believing in quite literally anything. Does this de facto make no position more valid than any other?

Answer 1

Intuition plays a significant role in philosophy, providing insight into the nature of things. However, rationality in philosophy is not solely based on intuition but also on logical reasoning and critical thinking. The validity of a position in philosophy is determined by the strength of arguments and evidence supporting it.

Step-by-step explanation:

Intuition plays a significant role in philosophy. It involves a kind of insight or understanding that is clear and certain. However, it is important to note that intuition in philosophy is different from the common usage of the term, which refers to gut feelings or hunches.

In philosophy, intuitions are used to gain insight into the nature of things. They often serve as a starting point for philosophical inquiry. While intuitions can be influential in shaping beliefs and arguments, they are not the sole basis for rationality and do not make one person more rational than another.

Rationality in philosophy is not solely based on intuitions but also relies on logical reasoning, critical thinking, and considering alternative views. It is through rigorous examination and evaluation of arguments and evidence that individuals can be deemed more rational than others. The validity of a position in philosophy is determined by the strength of the arguments and evidence supporting it, rather than the level of faith or intuition.