Final answer:
The claim that Karl Marx's unpublished works might indicate he was a satanist is speculative and lacks substantial evidence. Marx's known works critique capitalism and envision a classless society, with his comments on religion focusing on its role in maintaining social inequality. Claims regarding his satanism are not widely supported by historical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The book "Was Karl Marx a Satanist?" by Richard Wurmbrand raises a provocative question. However, skepticism should be applied when considering its claims. Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist whose writings on the nature of class struggle laid the foundation for modern socialism and communism, as epitomized in the Communist Manifesto coauthored with Friedrich Engels in 1848. It is true that not all of Marx's writings have been published; however, the suggestion that unpublished works indicate satanism is largely speculative. The reasons why some manuscripts remain unpublished could be multifaceted, including potential academic overlook, political motivations, or the perceived relevance of the documents.
Regarding the claim that Albert Camus found the unpublished works puzzling, without further context, this is not sufficient to draw conclusions about Marx's personal beliefs or alleged satanism. Marx's critique of religion, where he famously termed it the 'opium of the people,' is rooted in his belief that religion perpetuates social inequality. Marx's legacy is deeply entrenched in his analyses of capitalism and his vision for a classless society, rather than personal religious beliefs or practices.
Stalin's approach to documentation and historiography differs significantly from Marx, as he left behind fewer personal records, making it challenging to reconstruct his beliefs. Nonetheless, what is known of Marx does not substantiate claims of satanism but rather highlights his commitment to social and economic theory.