Question

In this analysis, the author delves into the interpretation of Beckett's Endgame as the epitome of meaningless literature, contrasting different perspectives on Adorno's view of art. While some perceive Adorno's stance as branding art as inherently meaningless, the author leans towards the interpretation that Endgame demonstrates the impossibility of an autonomous self, finding it more intriguing than a mere label of meaninglessness. The discussion emphasizes that Adorno's appreciation of the play lies not in its philosophical or existential aspects but in its structured meaninglessness, portraying a truth about an unavoidably meaningless society and how it perpetuates itself through individual conflicts. The rudeness and peculiarities of characters in Endgame are seen as universal deformations reflecting societal antagonisms, with Adorno viewing them as typical human traits shaped by society. The analysis acknowledges the play's intense portrayal of human flaws as a mirror image of ontology, emphasizing the connection between fragmented, non-identical elements and identity within the context of a theatrical performance.

Which interpretation of Beckett's Endgame does the author favor in the analysis?

A) Beckett's portrayal of an autonomous self
B) Adorno's emphasis on existential conditions
C) The play as a meaningless brand
D) Structured meaninglessness reflecting societal truth

Answer 1

The author of the analysis prefers the interpretation of Beckett's Endgame as an illustration of structured meaninglessness that reflects societal truths, aligning with Adorno's viewpoint and the broader context of Theatre of the Absurd and postmodernism.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the analysis presented, the author most strongly favors the interpretation of Samuel Beckett's Endgame as an example of structured meaninglessness reflecting societal truth. Rather than viewing the play as a mere depiction of an autonomous self or a focus on existential conditions, the author aligns with Adorno's perspective, suggesting that the play's chaotic lack of meaning actually conveys a profound truth about the society in which we live. This is illustrated by the bizarre actions and words of the characters, which are understood to mirror the deformations and conflict pervasive in society, thereby depicting universal human traits significantly shaped by societal context.

According to the author, Theatre of the Absurd, as exemplified by Endgame, attempts to engage with and respond to the postmodern condition by challenging traditional narrative logic, instead opting for a circular structure that demonstrates the inescapability of the status quo. Central to this worldview is the post-structuralist idea that language and texts construct rather than reflect reality, influencing our interpretation of the world as a series of interconnected signs.