Question

Your friend's argument asserting the truth of Islam based on the uniqueness of the Qur'an's textual style is flawed on several counts. Primarily, it commits the fallacy of argument from incredulity, assuming that the inability to imagine a non-divine origin implies a divine one. It also employs the divine fallacy by invoking God to explain the uniqueness without considering alternative explanations. The argument is a non-sequitur, as uniqueness alone doesn't logically lead to the conclusion of divine authorship. Additionally, the alleged certainty fallacy and Texas Sharpshooter fallacy are evident in presenting the claim of the Qur'an's uniqueness as a vital premise without sufficient basis. The probability aspect overlooks the fact that unlikely events can still occur by chance, and even if the Qur'an is unique, it doesn't necessarily indicate divine intervention. Ultimately, the argument lacks logical rigor and dismisses potential alternative explanations for the Qur'an's style. Which logical fallacy is most prominently exhibited in the argument claiming the truth of Islam based on the unique textual style of the Qur'an?

a) Argument from incredulity
b) Non-sequitur
c) Divine fallacy
d) Texas Sharpshooter fallacy

Answer 1

The argument from incredulity is the most prominent logical fallacy in the claim that the Qur'an's unique style proves the truth of Islam, as it assumes divine origin due to a lack of alternative explanations.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most prominently exhibited logical fallacy in the argument claiming the truth of Islam based on the unique textual style of the Qur'an is the argument from incredulity. This is because the argument relies on the assumption that because one cannot imagine how the Qur'an could have been produced without divine intervention, it must therefore have a divine origin. This type of reasoning fails to consider alternative explanations and leaps to a conclusion based on a lack of understanding or personal incredulity.