Question

Of course these are different fields yet I would wager that many consider morality to be subjective but probability to not be.

What is the correct answer to "Should I save my dog over an adult human being?" The answer seems to be: it depends on your moral framework.

Answer 1

Morality is a complex subject that may not differ significantly between religious and non-religious groups, suggesting a common moral intuition. It is likely grounded in neurobiology and cultural heritage, which contribute to our collective sense of ethics.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question at hand is deeply rooted in morality and whether it should be considered subjective or objective. This question relates to the broader field of Social Studies, specifically to the aspect of moral philosophy or ethics, and concerns individuals at a college level of understanding due to its complexity and the requirement for a nuanced discussion of moral frameworks. When confronted with moral dilemmas, people may respond differently depending on their cultural, religious backgrounds, and personal beliefs, but surprisingly, research has shown that there is not a significant difference in moral judgments between religious and non-religious groups. This suggests a universal moral intuition or a collective sense of ethics that transcends these backgrounds.

Morality is increasingly viewed as having roots both in the brain's neurobiology and cultural heritage. Despite differences in moral views among societies, there may exist overarching principles that all humans can recognize. This positions morality within the realm of neuroscientific study as well as philosophical and religious thought, creating a complex tapestry of factors that contribute to our moral judgments.