Final answer:
The analytic/synthetic division in both aesthetics and philosophy shares a conceptual foundation but manifests distinctly in Cubism. Analytic cubism deconstructs objects into fragmented views, while synthetic cubism focuses on flattening and collage effects, both challenging traditional perspectives and representing a shift in understanding space and meaning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The analytic/synthetic division in aesthetics, particularly when discussing Russian theatre and its comparison to cubist art, draws parallels to the terms' usage in philosophy. However, it also has unique characteristics defined by the specific context of art. In Cubism, analytic cubism involved disassembling objects into various angles and planes expressed through muted color palettes and complex geometry, aiming to depict a multiplicity of viewpoints simultaneously. Synthetic cubism, by contrast, used brighter colors and simpler shapes, often incorporating materials like paper for a collage effect, which emphasized the flattening of space.
The philosophical connection lies in the examination of perception and representation. Cubism as an art movement questioned traditional single-perspective representation, analogous to the philosophical inquiry into the nature of knowledge and its acquisition. Both the analytic and synthetic trends challenged the pre-existing norms, thus reflecting a shift in thinking about space, representation, and how we understand or construct meaning.