Final answer:
The tension between the Private Language Argument and the existence of God is predicated on the idea that in the absence of a PLA, God's language would be considered private, leading to difficulties in verifying statements about God's existence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The first basis for claiming tension between the Private Language Argument (PLA) and the existence of God is (a) God's language would be private in the absence of a PLA. This tension arises because if language is only verifiable within a particular context, as per later Wittgenstein, and if God's language were private, then the possibility of understanding or verifying any statement about God's existence becomes deeply problematic. Furthermore, in theological discourse, the language used to refer to God must be public for it to be meaningful to a community of believers, challenging the idea that God could have a private language.
The tension between the Private Language Argument (PLA) and the existence of God is rooted in the proposition that (a) God's language would be private in the absence of a PLA. According to later Wittgenstein, language gains meaning and significance through its use in a public context, making it accessible and verifiable within a specific community. If God were to have a private language, as suggested by the notion of a personal relationship with the divine, it introduces a challenge to the meaningfulness and verifiability of statements about God's existence.
In theological discourse, the language employed to discuss God is typically considered meaningful within a community of believers. However, the PLA raises questions about the nature of God's language and the possibility of private, ineffable communication. This tension underscores the complexities inherent in reconciling the theological concept of a personal connection with God with the linguistic framework proposed by Wittgenstein.