Final answer:
Argument 1 focuses on potential financial gains, while Argument 2 focuses on potential financial losses. Argument 1 emphasizes the upside of playing, while Argument 2 emphasizes the downside of playing. This means that in Argument 1, the writer believes they will come out ahead financially.
Step-by-step explanation:
The key difference highlighted in the basic assessment of Argument 1 and Argument 2 is that Argument 1 focuses on potential financial gains, while Argument 2 focuses on potential financial losses. Argument 1 emphasizes the upside of playing, while Argument 2 emphasizes the downside of playing. This means that in Argument 1, the writer believes they will come out ahead financially, whereas in Argument 2, the writer expects to come out behind financially.
Argument 1 focuses on potential financial gains, while Argument 2 focuses on potential financial losses. Argument 1 emphasizes the upside of playing, while Argument 2 emphasizes the downside of playing. This means that in Argument 1, the writer believes they will come out ahead financially, whereas in Argument 2, the writer expects to come out behind financially.