Question

CurrentLarge Language Modelslike the one used byChatGPTare now capable of generating texts with a high degree of originality, increasingly sophisticated and complex and often answer any question correctly. Furthermore, it can also be said that LLMs work on a probabilistic basis. With these premises and if these models continued to improve more and more and their outputs were indistinguishable from human ones, could we hypothesize that human creativity is a pie in the sky and all our mental processes, even the most sophisticated ones, and ultimately consciousness operate on a probabilistic basis?

Answer 1

Large Language Models like ChatGPT are indeed sophisticated, but equating human creativity and consciousness to merely probabilistic processes fails to acknowledge the complex nature of these human faculties. Consciousness, creativity, and human mental processes encompass more than what current LLMs can replicate or predict, considering subjective experience, self-awareness, and the hard problem of consciousness.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question you've posed touches on the nature of human creativity and consciousness in relation to the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. It is evident that LLMs, with their probabilistic underpinnings, are becoming increasingly sophisticated, generating text which could be confused with human output. However, to hypothesize that all human mental processes are probabilistic is to enter a complex debate integrating psychology, philosophy, and cognitive science.

Human creativity and consciousness are deeply complex and currently understood to go beyond simple probabilistic computation. While intelligence in humans indeed involves the processing of information, creativity is often seen as a spontaneous and innovative process that can be inspired by emotions, experiences, and a myriad of external and internal stimuli, which may resist complete computation or prediction.

Moreover, discussions about the nature of consciousness often consider not just computational ability, but subjective experience, self-awareness, and the 'hard problem' of consciousness, which involves explaining why and how we have qualia or subjective experiences. The comparison between human minds and computers is a common trope, yet it fails to capture the full nuances of human consciousness.