Final answer:
Scholars in the domains of philosophy of mind, language, and computational theory emphasize the significance of conceptual activity in the process of understanding. Notable thinkers like Ludwig Wittgenstein, Gottlob Frege, and Wilfrid Sellars contribute to the discourse on how concepts are fundamental in the interpretation of language, the mind-body problem, and the synergy of scientific and experiential narratives.
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, scholars have argued that the process of understanding is closely tied to conceptual activity, especially in the fields of philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, and computational theory of mind. For instance, in the philosophy of mind, the intimate connection between brain processes and mental concepts insists on a thorough conceptual framework to elucidate the mind-body problem. In philosophy of language, the structure of language and meaning is deeply enmeshed in the fabric of concepts, as demonstrated by Ludwig Wittgenstein's and Gottlob Frege's respective examinations of language's reference systems and logical structures.
Computational theory of mind considers mental processes as computational, bringing into play a wealth of conceptual scaffolding dealing with representational systems and symbol manipulation.
Philosophers like Wilfrid Sellars underscore the importance of philosophical know-how as a navigation through the world of concepts, highlighting that such skill is crucial for understanding how the natural world experienced directly (the "manifest image") relates to the scientific accounts of that world (the "scientific image"). Concurrently, cognitive science and psychology provide descriptive richness to this conceptual activity, though they do not prescribe how one ought to think exclusively; instead, they offer a basis for reflective improvement of thought processes.