Final answer:
British Indirect Rule involved leveraging local power structures, which was cost-effective, allowed for decentralization, and maintained continuity. Officers were encouraged to study local languages to govern effectively and were instructed to implement changes cautiously under the principle of 'Festina Lente'. The system trained locals to assist in administration, foreshadowing eventual self-governance.
Step-by-step explanation:
British Indirect Rule and Lugard's Policies
The British Indirect Rule system implemented in various colonies utilized the existing local power structures, thereby being cost-effective as it reduced the need for a large number of British administrators. Native chiefs were instrumental in maintaining the order and ensuring the flow of resources to the British. This approach also allowed for decentralization, where local governance could be more attuned to the specific needs and customs of the region. The reliance on native chiefs maintained continuity of local customs and administrative structures, which was less disruptive and more acceptable to the colonized populations.
Colonial resident officers were encouraged to study local languages to better understand and govern the populations under the British Empire. Captain Frederick Lugard, who was influential in establishing indirect rule in Nigeria, advocated for the policy of 'Festina Lente' (hasten slowly), arguing that it was important to make administrative changes cautiously to avoid unintentional harm and resistance.
The British trained locals in various administrative and professional roles, aiming to prepare them for eventual self-governance. However, the immediate benefits for the British were the administrative assistance and maintenance of control without extensive direct British intervention, which also tied the local elites' interests with those of the British Empire.