150k views
1 vote
Can a desire to leave a legacy be a form of 'other-worldliness' which should be subject to scrutiny?

User Saleena
by
8.8k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The desire to leave a legacy can be considered a form of 'other-worldliness' that might be subject to scrutiny. It is important to examine the motivations behind leaving a legacy and ensure that it aligns with ethical principles and responsibilities to the present world and future generations.

Step-by-step explanation:

The desire to leave a legacy can be considered a form of 'other-worldliness' that might be subject to scrutiny. 'Other-worldliness' refers to a focus on future generations and a desire to make a lasting impact beyond one's own lifetime. While leaving a legacy can be seen as a positive aspiration, it is important to examine the motivations behind it and ensure that it aligns with ethical principles and responsibilities toward the present world and future generations. It is essential to scrutinize the intentions and consequences of legacy-building.

For example, if someone seeks to leave a positive legacy by making meaningful contributions to society, such as working towards social justice or environmental sustainability, their desire to make a lasting impact can be seen as a form of 'other-worldliness' that promotes the well-being of others. However, if the desire to leave a legacy is driven solely by personal ego or a disregard for the present world and the needs of others, then it should be subjected to scrutiny. Ultimately, the scrutiny of the desire to leave a legacy is important to ensure that it is approached with genuine intentions and a consideration of ethical values, rather than being solely focused on personal gain or neglecting the needs of the present world.

User Darshan Miskin
by
7.9k points