60.8k views
2 votes
Are Deleuze's schizos = his people to come? I've read a very little Deleuze. The former is from 'anti-oedipus', the latter from a discussion of Klee in 'Qu’est-ce que la philosophie'? Are they the same people? I think the latter write meaninglessly, which is why I ask.

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Deleuze's concepts of 'schizos' and 'people to come' serve different functions in his philosophy. Schizos challenge the existing social and capitalist structures, while 'people to come' are a hopeful projection of future possibilities in thought and creativity.

Step-by-step explanation:

When considering Gilles Deleuze's concepts of schizos from 'Anti-Oedipus' and his notion of 'people to come' from the discussion of Klee in 'Qu’est-ce que la philosophie?', it is important to understand that they represent different aspects of Deleuze's philosophy. The 'schizos' refer to individuals who escape the rigid structures of society and capitalism, thriving in continuous states of becoming, whereas 'people to come' refer to future individuals or entities that have the potential to emerge from the current realities and create new ways of thinking and being.

Both concepts embody Deleuze's critique of static identities and his vision for a future where the creative potential of difference is realized. However, they are not exactly the same; the former is rooted in a critique of psychoanalysis and capitalism, while the latter is more of a hopeful, forward-looking concept linked to the potential of art and creativity. While schizos challenge existing standards and norms, 'people to come' suggests a new form of life or thought that is yet to be actualized.

User Bzmw
by
7.9k points