Final answer:
The Bakunin/Marx split was about the role of government in socialism; Marx saw a transitional state as necessary, while Bakunin advocated for its immediate abolition and promoted a direct overthrow of the current system through his secret organization.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Bakunin/Marx argument revolved around their differing views on the role of government in achieving a socialist state. While Karl Marx acknowledged a transitional state governed by workers was necessary to manage society until class divisions and inequalities could be eradicated, Mikhail Bakunin, a prominent anarchist, vehemently opposed any form of government, insisting on its immediate abolition.
Bakunin feared that a worker's state could lead to a new form of oppression. advocate for a direct overthrow of the existing social and political order to allow human's natural tendencies towards peaBakunin's "secret organisation" was his attempt to organize large anarchist movements, particularly in Italy and Spain, to ce and altruism to flourish and build a better society.
The Bakunin/Marx argument centered on their divergent perspectives regarding the role of government in establishing a socialist state. Karl Marx advocated for a transitional state, controlled by workers, to manage society until class divisions and inequalities were eliminated. In contrast, Mikhail Bakunin, an influential anarchist, passionately opposed any form of government and insisted on its immediate abolition. Bakunin was apprehensive that the establishment of a worker's state might lead to a new form of oppression.
Bakunin's opposition to government extended to his "secret organisation" efforts, aimed at organizing large anarchist movements, particularly in Italy and Spain. His objective was to directly overthrow the existing social and political order, allowing for the natural tendencies of humanity towards peace and altruism to flourish, ultimately creating a society free from hierarchical structures and coercive authority. The Bakunin/Marx debate encapsulates the broader ideological rift within socialist thought regarding the role of government in the pursuit of a more egalitarian and just society.