Final answer:
Determining which explanation is simpler involves evaluating how well it fits with the evidence and avoiding unnecessary assumptions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Determining which explanation is simpler often involves applying the principle of Occam's Razor, a problem-solving principle attributing the lack of necessity to unlikely explanations when a simpler one is available. The simpler explanation usually aligns better with evidence and involves fewer assumptions. Scientists use a range of criteria to judge hypotheses, preferring those that are most parsimonious, coherent with established knowledge, and empirically valid. To ensure an explanation is reasonable, verifying the units in calculations or checking against known physical principles (like friction affecting movement down an incline) can be effective strategies. Logical inferences and aligned evidence make an explanation more credible in the realm of science.
This process relies heavily on reason and evidence in order to explain physical events or a physical state of affairs.
For example, if there are multiple competing hypotheses supported by evidence, scientists may judge which hypothesis is better based on several criteria. A hypothesis that has more evidence and fits the facts better is more likely to be accepted.In conclusion, the simplicity of an explanation is determined by how well it aligns with the facts and is supported by evidence.