Final answer:
The Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit is a philosophical argument opposing the complexity argument of Intelligent Design. It likens the existence of God to the probability of a 747 being assembled by a storm.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to the Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit, which is a counter-argument to the argument of complexity proposed by Intelligent Design advocates. This gambit is often discussed within philosophy, specifically in debates concerning the existence of God and the arguments around creationism versus evolution. The gambit likens the probability of a deity's existence to the likelihood of a 'hurricane blowing through a junkyard and assembling a Boeing 747.' Critics argue that positing a complex deity to explain complexity in the universe simply raises further questions regarding the origin of the deity itself.
An obvious flaw that some identify in the Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit is that it assumes a complex being like God would need an explanation equivalent to the complexities found within the universe. Critics argue this is a category error, as the nature of a hypothetical divine being would inherently differ from that of the universe it creates. Therefore, the analogy may be seen as inappropriate for the kind of explanation it seeks to counter.