Final answer:
Subvaluationism's allowance for non-absolute truth claims aligns with Buddhism's Middle Way and non-dualistic worldview, particularly in their mutual caution against fixing reality within rigid propositions or a static self.
Step-by-step explanation:
The link between subvaluationism and Buddhism lies in the shared conceptual space of non-assertive truth claims, characterized by avoiding extreme positions. Subvaluationism, in logic, regards propositions as possibly neither true nor false, thereby facilitating a 'middle way' in the evaluation of statements. This parallels the Buddhist notion of the Middle Way, which is a fundamental principle guiding moral life as per Buddha's teachings, advocating for a path between extremes of asceticism and sensual indulgence.
In Buddhism, the concept of the Four Noble Truths outlines a path to enlightenment that resonates with subvaluationist principles by encouraging followers to acknowledge and detach from the suffering caused by desires. Furthermore, Buddhism's emphasis on causal relationships, as seen in the doctrine of dependent origination, reflects a contemplative avoidance of absolute claims about an individuated self or fixed reality, mirroring the subvaluationist approach to truth values in propositions.