Final answer:
A list of names cannot be a proposition because it lacks a claim that can be judged true or false. Symbolic interactionists would focus on the meanings attached to names in social contexts. Terms like 'minority' persist due to historical connotations and socio-political factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
A list of names by itself does not express a proposition because it lacks a declarative structure that can assert something about the world that can be evaluated as true or false. A proposition is a statement that affirms or denies something and is capable of being either true or false. For instance, “The sky is blue” is a proposition because it claims the color of the sky. Simply listing names like “Alice, Bob, Charlie” does not provide any claim or assertion that can be judged for its truthfulness.
In the social sciences, a symbolic interactionist may argue that names and labels can have significant implications on interactions and perceptions. They could suggest that instead of banning names, society should be aware of the meanings and assumptions attached to them and strive for more inclusive and understanding social interactions. Therefore, a symbolic interactionist would focus on the meanings that names create within social contexts rather than discussing their ability to form propositions.
Concerning political terminology and the persistence of certain terms, words like “minority” and “subordinate” or “liberal” and “conservative” carry with them historical and social connotations that evolve. The reason why certain terms persist, or their associations reverse could be due to various socio-political factors, the influence of media, and changing societal values.