Final answer:
The Redemption of God approach in the message of Job views God as preferring a world with free will where evil is an unfortunate consequence, and does not consider God responsible for evil. God's role is seen as aiding in 'soul-making' rather than directly intervening in the prevention of evil, framing divine characteristics in the context of a developmental plan for humanity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Redemption of God approach to the message of Job suggests a view that aligns with ideas of Process Theology and the exploration of the Problem of Evil. It asserts that God prefers a world of free agents over a world of robots, implying that free will is paramount in the divine framework of life.
As a result of this freedom, evil becomes an unfortunate, though not unavoidable, consequence. It is argued that for God to intervene in matters of evil would mean to revoke human free-will. Therefore, within this understanding, God is not deemed responsible for the existence of evil nor is God seen as neglectful for not intervening. Instead, this interpretation of the message of Job offers a view where God is involved in the process of 'soul-making,' with the experience and endurance of evil serving a developmental and teleological purpose, as suggested by theologian Irenaeus and later, philosophers like John Hick and Richard Swinburne.
This approach arguably provides a different perspective on the characteristics traditionally attributed to the deity, such as being all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, by reframing divine omnipotence and omnibenevolence in the context of a deity that allows for the existence of suffering and evil as part of a broader divine plan centered on soul development and the cultivation of genuine goodness.