Final answer:
Wrongdoing often results in self-inflicted punishment as it harms the individual's character, leading to a corrupted soul, according to Socrates. Practical consequences such as loss of trust and damaged reputation reinforce the negative outcomes of wrongful acts. Thus, even without external punishment, the wrongdoer faces repercussions through their own conscience and societal judgment.
Step-by-step explanation:
Doing wrong often brings its own punishment because the act, even if initially beneficial to the wrongdoer, eventually leads to negative consequences. When a person chooses to commit a wrongful act, they might initially see it as beneficial. However, beyond any immediate advantage, wrongful actions often have a deeper, more adverse impact on the individual's conscience, reputation, or future opportunities. Socrates stated that by doing evil deeds, people are harming their own soul or character, which is a much worse fate than any external punishment. This harm to one's character can lead to a corrupted soul, which is indeed a severe self-inflicted punishment.
Moreover, there are practical outcomes to consider. Cheating, for example, might provide short-term gains, but if such acts become widespread, trust in societal institutions and professional integrity is eroded. In the long run, the responsibility to bear the consequences of one's actions is a form of self-regulation, ensuring that society as a whole can operate on the basis of trust and mutual respect. Decisions that are not aligned with integrity and honesty might lead to personal and professional failures, damaging self-esteem and societal standing.