Final answer:
The harsh words in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 about women's silence in churches may have been written by Paul or inserted by a scribe later. Early Christian texts are open to interpretation, and there is evidence that documents from antiquity often contain bias or alterations to suit different purposes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks whether the words found in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 were actually written by Paul, inserted by a scribe at a later date, intentionally altered while Paul was dictating, or actually written by Luke. This is a topic of debate among scholars and pertains to the field of biblical studies and early Christian history. The passage in question advises women to remain silent in churches, which has been a contentious issue in interpreting Paul's views and the role of women in the early Church.
Early Christianity was characterized by a lack of a single set of texts or unified beliefs. In 11.6: Early Christianity, it was highlighted that St. Paul, who was known for his transformation from a Jewish leader to a Christian evangelist, contributed significantly to the spread of Christian doctrine. It is also asserted that many of Jesus's teachings are open to interpretation, leading to differing opinions among early Christians.
The analysis of whether biblical texts reflect the original intent of the authors often includes determining the purpose behind their writing - factual reporting, persuasion, or other reasons. For instance, in a letter by Cicero that was never meant for publication, one can see that documents from antiquity can contain personal defensiveness or bias, suggesting that not all writings were meant to be doctrinal or authoritative.
Therefore, the words in 1 Corinthians might have been written by Paul as some scholars argue based on the style and theological consistency, or possibly added by a later scribe, reflecting a common practice of the time where scribes might insert clarifications or alterations. The possibility that they were added by Luke is generally considered less likely by scholars, as there is no strong evidence to support this claim.