Final answer:
The statement that Christ came so no one would have to keep the Law anymore oversimplifies St. Paul's teachings in early Christianity. Paul's doctrine signifies a shift from the Jewish Law to faith in Christ for salvation, which implies a transformation rather than a complete rejection of the Law.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question addresses the theological perspective of the role that Jesus Christ played about Jewish Law, as influenced by Paul's teachings in early Christianity. The assertion that Christ came so that no one would have to keep the Law anymore is a simplified and somewhat misleading interpretation.
Early Christian teachings, particularly those of St. Paul, suggest that Christ's sacrifice offers salvation to all, superseding the traditional Jewish Law. It's important to recognize that the nuances of Christian doctrine have been debated for centuries, and Paul's teachings were pivotal in understanding the shift from Law to grace in Christian theology.
However, saying that one does not have to keep the Law at all might misrepresent the complexity of Pauline theology, which speaks more to the idea of the Law being fulfilled in Christ, rather than simply discarded.
While Paul undoubtedly argued that faith in Christ was the means of salvation and that following the Mosaic Law was not required for Gentiles, he did not advocate for a complete abandonment of moral law but rather a reorientation towards a life led by the Spirit and grounded in love and the teachings of Jesus Christ. Therefore, the student's statement is somewhat false, as it misinterprets the intricate balance Paul describes between law and grace.