Final answer:
Eltis's critique of Carney's Brown Rice Thesis was wrong because it misunderstood the main points of Carney's argument and dismissed the significance of cultural practices as historical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Eltis's critique of Carney's Brown Rice Thesis was wrong because it did not accurately address the main points of Carney's argument and misunderstood the evidence and conclusions presented. Eltis argued that Carney's thesis was flawed because it focused on the consumption of brown rice by slaves as evidence of their resistance and cultural retention, but Eltis believed that this was simply a practical dietary choice due to the availability of rice in the Americas. However, Eltis failed to consider the historical context and the significance of foodways as a form of resistance and identity among enslaved Africans and their descendants.
Additionally, Eltis dismissed the importance of cultural practices and foodways as relevant sources of historical evidence. He argued that Carney's thesis was based on unreliable evidence and subjective interpretation, but this overlooks the value of cultural practices as a form of agency and resistance in the face of oppression.