Final answer:
It is true that Shakespeare's reputation is often accepted without direct personal engagement with his works. His inclusion in educational curriculums and the historical prominence of his plays in the Western Canon contribute to his renown, but his talents as a playwright and mastery of language also justify his lasting fame and significance.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is true that many people praise Shakespeare without direct experience of his works, as the renown of William Shakespeare often precedes personal engagement with his texts. While it is undeniable that Shakespeare's language can be challenging to understand when read passively in a classroom, it is designed for performance—something that may not always happen in educational settings. This performance aspect brings his words to life and is key in appreciating his mastery over the dramatic arts.
However, it's also true that Shakespeare’s stature in the Western literary canon has been bolstered by historical and cultural factors beyond the intrinsic quality of his work. His elevation can be partially attributed to the ways in which his works align with and have been promoted within the dominantly accepted cultural narratives, especially during the times of colonial expansion and the rise of the Western European Canon.
Part of what perpetuates Shakespeare's high reputation is the traditional academia and curriculum choices which include his work as an essential study. His inclusion in school curriculums worldwide ensures a continued cultural and intellectual presence. Furthermore, Shakespeare's legacy is kept alive by various authentic likenesses, such as the memorial bust in the Holy Trinity Church, enhancing our sense of connection to him.