Final answer:
While the specific definition of literature from Dr. Rearick is not provided, the Declaration of Independence is generally seen as a historical document. It incorporates John Locke's theories and democratic ideals, expressing inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Some might argue for its literary significance due to its rhetorical strategies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed relates to whether The Declaration of Independence is regarded as a form of literature by Dr. Rearick's definition. However, without knowing the specific definition provided by Dr. Rearick referenced in the question, one cannot definitively declare it as true or false. Rather, one can speak to the nature of The Declaration of Independence and its significance in history.
Typically, The Declaration of Independence is considered a historical document rather than a piece of literature. It is famously known for embodying John Locke's theories on personal rights and the role of government, as it indeed borrows heavily from Locke's philosophy. As the declaration states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal", reflecting the Lockean principle that human beings have certain inalienable rights. The Declaration of Independence also serves to articulate the colonies' reasons for seeking independence from Britain, making it a critical document in American and global history.
Considering its content and purpose, the text does have a literary quality—especially in its use of persuasive language and rhetorical strategies. Hence, some might argue that the Declaration carries literary significance beyond its political impact. Ultimately, this document is more than a mere list of grievances; it is a proclamation that announced fundamental democratic principles and continues to influence thinking about government and human rights.