Question

Wittgenstein's language game concept holds that the meaning of a word can only be derived from its usage. However, some philosophers contend that some words have meanings other than that implied by their usage. What evidence is there to this effect? Wittgenstein, however, repudiated the idea that language is separate from reality. Language and action are interwoven.

Answer 1

Wittgenstein's language game concept holds that the meaning of a word can only be derived from its usage. However, evidence suggests that language and thought are intertwined, and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis proposes that the language we speak influences our perception of reality and our behavior.

Step-by-step explanation:

Wittgenstein's language game concept holds that the meaning of a word can only be derived from its usage. However, some philosophers contend that some words have meanings other than that implied by their usage. One piece of evidence to support this is the idea that language and thought are intertwined. Psychologists have investigated whether language shapes thoughts and actions, or whether our thoughts and beliefs shape our language. Another piece of evidence is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which suggests that the language we speak influences our perception of reality and our behavior. Linguists Edward Sapir and Benjamin Whorf proposed that different languages divide up the natural world in different ways and that language functions as a mirror of reality.