Final answer:
The concept that God's knowledge is a function of His power implies that His ability to know is inherently linked to His omnipotence. Maimonides and Christian Scientists offer divergent perspectives on divine knowledge, whereas Leibniz and Yacob provide supportive arguments for God's omniscience.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conception of God as presented by Dr. Eugene Scott suggests that God's knowledge is determined by his omnipotence. This presupposes that God, being all-powerful, has the ability to know anything that he chooses to know. The coherence of this idea can be debated from various philosophical and theological perspectives.
For instance, Maimonides posits that comparing God's knowledge and power to human attributes is misleading, as divine attributes are infinite, unlike human cognition and capabilities, which are finite. On the other hand, Christian Scientists view God as an all-encompassing spirit, negating material existence in favor of a wholly spiritual understanding of being and knowledge.
Philosophers such as Leibniz argue in support of God's omniscience by considering this world as the best possible world, opposing the notion that any lack exists in God's power, knowledge, or goodness. Conversely, others, like Yacob, emphasize the role of reason in understanding divinity, suggesting our intelligence is a reflection of God's wisdom. Here, God's omniscience, rather than being a mere function of power, is intrinsic to His nature as the creator and sustainer of all.