106k views
0 votes
The principle of sufficient reason states that everything must have a reason. Let us suppose that this is false. Let us further suppose that one comes across something and cannot find a current existing explanation for it. Given the falsity of PSR, can one simply leave it at that and just accept that observation as brute fact without looking for an explanation?

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The principle of sufficient reason states that everything must have a reason. Even if this principle is false, relying on reasoning is essential to arrive at well-founded beliefs.

Step-by-step explanation:

The principle of sufficient reason (PSR) states that everything must have a reason. However, if we suppose that PSR is false and we come across something for which we cannot find a current explanation, it does not mean that we can simply accept it as a brute fact without looking for an explanation. In philosophy, the use of reasoning is essential in order to evaluate claims and strive for a coherent system of beliefs. Reasoning allows us to hypothesize, work out consequences, assess coherence, and generate plausible explanations. It is through reasoning and evidence that we can come to understand and explain the world around us. Therefore, even if the principle of sufficient reason is false, relying on reasoning is still crucial in order to arrive at well-founded beliefs.

User Tanvi B
by
7.6k points