Final answer:
Freedom of the will is conceptually tied to the idea of autonomy, whereby the will is self-governing, free from external and internal constraints. The debate over determinism versus free will examines whether human actions are predetermined or if individuals can act freely. This has significant implications across philosophy, religion, law, and ethics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed centers around the concept of autonomy in regards to freedom of the will, which suggests that a will that is autonomous is one that functions as a law unto itself. This autonomy is a facet of the concept of free will, the ability to make choices free from certain constraints such as physical, social, mental, and metaphysical limitations. The dilemma of determinism versus free will explores whether humans have the capacity to act freely, in a manner not fully determined by preceding events and conditions, or whether their actions are predictable like a physical object governed by the laws of nature.
Libertarianism offers a perspective here, positing that individuals have free will and are not entirely subject to deterministic forces. However, it acknowledges challenges, such as the influence of socialization and conditioning by society's norms and values on one's freedom of action. Moreover, the concept of freedom involves being able to pursue one's own choices in terms of production, trade, and ownership within society without external coercion.
The philosophical query highlights the tension between an individual's perceived sense of free will and the observable deterministic nature of the universe. The ability to reconcile these opposing views is crucial in various domains such as religion, law, and ethics.