42.7k views
4 votes
I was looking into the practicality of rail-gun technology to achieve orbital launches (As promoted by the answers at What is the possibility of a railgun assisted orbital launch? ), but found that the heat generated at 3000 meters per second (About 3 miles/sec) would be insane. The downstream calculation for launch vehicle of less than 10000 kg with a diameter of about 2 feet (.6 m), and a drag coefficient of .25, would be a power loss of 1.28 GW, with a specific heat change of 8000 degrees celsius over 6 seconds (The bottom 18 miles of the atmosphere at 3 miles/sec). Just 3000 m/s would suggest it'd burn up due to the atmospheric drag. The lighter you are, the more temperature will increase at this speed and cross-sectional area.

So this begs the question, what is the fastest speed that can be attained from a railgun launcher without burning up like a comet travelling at 25 km / sec. I'm suspecting this might be the real limit to using railguns to achieve the necessary escape velocity of 11 km/s to reach geostationary orbit. I'm speculating a hybrid approach of using railguns at lower speeds (2km/s to achieve 100-150 mile height) and rocket for the rest of the way to geostationary orbit might be advantageous, but not sure if the benefits are significant enough compared to regular rockets.

There may be certain technologies that enable higher atmospheric travel speeds, but it's mostly speculative. Advanced futuristic heat shields may enable higher orbital launch speeds from railgun technology. Advanced enough technology might enable the 11 km/sec required for earth's escape velocity, but that's probably some highly advanced technology.

Existing navy railguns can achieve 2 km/s, which could probably reach launch heights of 100-200 miles.

User Spodger
by
7.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Railgun technology has potential for orbital launches, but the heat generated at high speeds could be a challenge due to atmospheric drag. A hybrid approach of using railguns at lower speeds and rockets for the rest of the way may be advantageous. Current navy railguns can achieve speeds of 2 km/s.

Step-by-step explanation:

Railgun technology has the potential to achieve high speeds for orbital launches, but the heat generated at those speeds would be a challenge. The increase in temperature is due to atmospheric drag, particularly in the lower part of the atmosphere. The lighter the launch vehicle, the more the temperature will increase at high speeds. Therefore, the fastest speed that can be attained from a railgun launcher without burning up would depend on the specific design and technology used.

To reach the necessary escape velocity of 11 km/s to reach geostationary orbit, a hybrid approach of using railguns at lower speeds (such as 2 km/s to achieve a height of 100-150 miles) and rockets for the rest of the way may be advantageous. This avoids the excessive heat generated at higher railgun speeds. However, the benefits of this approach compared to regular rockets would need further evaluation.

It's important to note that current navy railguns can achieve speeds of 2 km/s, which could potentially reach launch heights of 100-200 miles.

User Logman
by
7.7k points