Question

Utilitarismus is very hated for going against things like the right to live, steal and so on. Utilitarians typically have tried to reconcile the doctrine with this common-sense aspect of ethics. But most of this complains and most of ethics have been all about creating mental experiments to show the unacceptability of the consequences of the rival ethical theory. But Humans are emotional beings, reason is no more than a mean to regulate the emotions and expand comprehensions, and therefore all analysis of a ethical moral experiment will be no more than an emotional reaction either because the individual used reason to conclude that is goes against one of his goals (goals are emotional preferences), or because he feels agression, either case all reaction to such experiments are always emotional. Thus the Gedanken experiment method of ethics is fundamentally flawed because it cannot prove more than feelings, and every attempt of defend it will be no more than a attempt to defend emotivism (and doubt that more than a minory wants to accept this price). So why this is not the standard response by Utilitariasnism to all of this accusations?, and they have already used it?

Answer 1

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on maximizing overall happiness. Critics argue that ethical experiments only elicit emotional reactions, but this is not commonly addressed by utilitarians.

Step-by-step explanation:

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on maximizing the overall happiness for the greatest number of people. While some people criticize utilitarianism for going against basic rights such as the right to live and steal, utilitarians argue that the consequences of an action should determine its moral correctness. They believe that acting in a way that produces the greatest amount of pleasure or satisfaction for the most people is morally right.

However, some criticisms of utilitarianism have raised concerns about the method used to evaluate moral decisions. It is argued that ethical moral experiments, known as Gedanken experiments, only elicit emotional reactions and cannot prove more than feelings. This is because humans are emotional beings, and reason is used to regulate emotions and expand comprehension. Therefore, any reaction to such experiments will always be emotional. However, this argument is not commonly used by utilitarians as a defense.