Final answer:
Elmire is able to resolve the dilemma by recognizing the value of cooperation over competition and embodying personal agency over societal norms, akin to the moral in the prisoner's dilemma and Nora's self-determination in Ibsen's play.
Step-by-step explanation:
Elmire alone is able to resolve the dilemma because she embodies the capacity to navigate through conflict by recognizing the pitfalls of individual self-interest and the value of cooperation. Drawing parallels from the given references, Elmire's situation mirrors the prisoner's dilemma from game theory, as outlined by LibreTexts™, where the best outcome is derived from cooperation rather than competition. The dilemma is resolved not by cunning tricks, as with Krogstad in Ibsen's play, but through an understanding that collective happiness is achievable when individuals work together harmoniously and overcome obstacles.
In Nora's case, her ultimate decision to leave Helmer is her way of trying to resolve her internal conflict, signifying her departure from societal expectations and the realization of her own needs and desires. Elmire, who is not directly referenced in the provided excerpts but can be understood through thematic similarity, likely finds a way to cleverly manage the situation akin to Nora's self-assertion and pursuit of personal truth. Both examples illustrate the triumph of personal agency over imposed norms, albeit achieved through different means.