Question

How is I don't like to hit people any different from I don't like to eat chocolate? Both are desires. Certain desires may be more universal than others but why is this relevant? How can there be a deeper justification for any desire apart from the fact that we feel them?

Answer 1

The difference between 'I don't like to hit people' and 'I don't like to eat chocolate' lies in the desires and the reasons behind them. The relevancy of each desire depends on the context and values involved. A deeper justification for any desire goes beyond personal feelings and includes considerations of morality, ethics, and societal norms.

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference between the statements 'I don't like to hit people' and 'I don't like to eat chocolate' lies in the desires and the reasons behind them. While both desires are personal and subjective, the relevancy of each desire depends on the context and values involved. The deeper justification for any desire goes beyond personal feelings and includes considerations of morality, ethics, and societal norms.

For example, not liking to hit people may be rooted in the understanding that causing harm to others is morally wrong and goes against societal values of kindness and non-violence. On the other hand, not liking to eat chocolate may simply be a matter of personal preference and taste.