Question

If a person has sex with another engaged individual, knowing that the individual is engaged/married to another person, is the engaged individual fully moral responsible for the betrayal or is the moral responsibility shared? What are the school of thoughts on this matter, in the field of moral studies? If the knowledge of the engaged individual's marital status is shared with the extra-marital partner either on purpose or not, the moral responsibility falls to both of them. There are multiple points of communication that need to exist to determine whether there is actually any wrongdoing, namely if the extramarital sex is actually considered a betrayal instead of simply an indulgence of acceptable nature. For the extramarital partner, knowingly engaging in intercourse with the engaged partner without at least second-hand consent from the other person in the engagement would be considered immoral, as there is a potential for conflict should the relationship be found out. The engaged person needs to communicate the boundaries of the extramarital relationship to the possible extramarital partner, as setup by them and their engaged. In turn, there must be communication between the two engaged people about what said boundaries look like, again due to possible conflict should communication not occur. However, if the marital status of the engaged is not known to the extramarital partner, then the responsibility of the betrayal (and any possible ramifications) is entirely the fault of the engaged. Amusing. Obviously, it's a tangled web we weave, but infidelity is an action, and I am not usually in control of other people's, unless I am very suggestive (that's schizophrenic bloom). If I give my other half permission, then yes. If not, then no way am I morally to blame.a. Individual responsibility: Some ethical frameworks focus on individual accountability, placing the responsibility primarily on the person who's engaged or married. They argue that the committed individual is the one who made a promise or commitment to their partner and thus bears the moral responsibility for any breach of that commitment.

b. Shared responsibility: Others believe that both parties involved in the extramarital relationship share moral responsibility. They argue that while the engaged person has a commitment to their partner, the other party also knowingly engaged in an affair, which goes against the moral principles of respect and fidelity.

c. Communication and consent: There's a perspective that emphasizes the importance of clear communication and consent. According to this view, if the engaged person doesn't communicate their relationship status or boundaries to the other person, the responsibility might rest more on the engaged individual. However, if both parties are aware of the engagement and still proceed, they share responsibility.

d. Context and agreement: Some consider the specific circumstances and agreements within the relationship. If the engaged person's partner consents or knows about the extramarital relationship, some argue that this diminishes the betrayal aspect, while others see it as a shared decision between the engaged person and their partner.

Answer 1

The question of moral responsibility in cases of infidelity is complex and varies depending on different ethical perspectives. Some argue for individual responsibility, while others emphasize shared responsibility. Communication, consent, and the specific circumstances of the relationship are also taken into consideration.

Step-by-step explanation:

A: The question of moral responsibility in cases of infidelity is a complex one, and moral philosophers have different perspectives on this matter.

One school of thought argues for individual responsibility, placing the moral burden primarily on the engaged or married person who is cheating. They believe that the person who made a commitment to their partner should bear the responsibility for betraying that commitment.

Another perspective emphasizes shared responsibility, arguing that both parties involved in the extramarital affair share moral culpability. They argue that while the engaged person has a commitment to their partner, the other party also knowingly engaged in an affair, which goes against the moral principles of respect and fidelity.

Some philosophers highlight the importance of communication and consent. If the engaged person doesn't communicate their relationship status or boundaries to the other person, the responsibility might rest more on the engaged individual. However, if both parties are aware of the engagement and still proceed, they share responsibility.

Lastly, some consider the specific circumstances and agreements within the relationship. If the engaged person's partner consents to or knows about the extramarital relationship, some argue that this diminishes the betrayal aspect, while others see it as a shared decision.