136k views
4 votes
Positing that God exists and is perfect (by the fact that he is the moral authority and is thought of as absolute perfection according to the general consensus); a change that he makes would mean that he was less or more perfect before the change came about. This follows the logic that something that is absolutely perfect must be unchangeable, because change is either for better or for worse. Any change would mean that God was more perfect or less perfect before or after the change. This is impossible, because God is absolutely perfect, there can therfore be no change in God or his thoughts.

This change I'm referring to is the creation of the universe. The creation of the universe means that he underwent a change, because He was previously lacking a universe which he now has, and as I have stated, change in God is impossible. Logically, then, there could have been no creation, and the logical conclusion is that because God is absolutely perfect he must not have created the universe, or anything for that matter. Nothing therefore exists. We are all a delusion.

Though for a being (us humans) to think about his own existence precipitates that we be in existence. Therfore God should not exist by the very fact that we can question our existence. For, our existence is impossible if we believe in a perfect God (following my previous reasoning).

In summary, does our existence, which is a creation and therefore represents some manifestation of change, imply that God is not perfect or simply does not exist, because perfection precludes change?

User Wirling
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The question explores whether the existence of the universe implies imperfection in God or the non-existence of God. Different philosophical viewpoints offer perspectives on the nature of God and the relationship between God and the universe.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question at hand is whether the existence of the universe implies that God is not perfect or simply does not exist. The argument presented in the question is based on the assumption that God is a perfect being and that any change would imply imperfection. However, there are different philosophical viewpoints on the nature of God and the relationship between God and the universe.


One viewpoint is panentheism, which suggests that God contains the universe but is not identical with it. In this view, God is changeable about the actions taking place in the universe. However, the abstract qualities of God, such as goodness and wisdom, remain eternal and solid.


Another perspective is Descartes' argument for the existence of God, which states that God necessarily possesses the quality of existence. Therefore, if God is a perfect being, it follows that God exists both in the mind and in reality.

User East
by
8.8k points