Question

Imagine a hypothetical universe where 1 million days have gone by.

Imagine another where 1 billion days have gone by.
Assume that in each case, one has found no direct evidence of god operating in the world. Is this longer period of time of absence further evidence against god?
Should one feel more confident in god’s non existence in the second compared to the first scenario?

Answer 1

The absence of direct evidence of God operating in two hypothetical universes does not provide further evidence against God's existence. The lack of evidence does not prove the non-existence of God.

Step-by-step explanation:

The absence of direct evidence of God operating in the hypothetical universes where 1 million days and 1 billion days have gone by does not necessarily provide further evidence against God. The lack of evidence does not prove the non-existence of God. Believers in God may argue that God's existence transcends direct evidence and can be supported by faith or personal experiences. Non-believers, on the other hand, may question the reliability and accuracy of the reports of religious experiences, as there are alternative explanations for such experiences.