Question

Salaamualykum, I would like this argument to be strengthened by criticism: Everything has a cause, by cause I mean mean something that therefores it regardless of your definition. if something happened without that, the therefore would be the fact it can happen in a possible reality, thus showing that this is impossible in a possible reality.

Answer 1

The Cosmological Argument seeks to establish the existence of a necessary being as the cause of all contingent beings. However, there are criticisms and weaknesses that challenge the argument's strength.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument you are referring to is known as the Cosmological Argument, which seeks to establish the existence of a necessary being that is the cause of all contingent beings. However, there are criticisms and rebuttals to this argument that aim to weaken its strength. One of the criticisms is the notion that some events, like quantum events, do not need causes. Another criticism is the fallacy of composition, which challenges the assumption that there can only be one necessary cause.

Furthermore, it is important to note that the absence of evidence or proof does not constitute a basis for accepting a particular cause as the cause of a phenomenon. Withholding acceptance of a conclusion is necessary when there is no concrete evidence to establish a cause.

In conclusion, while the Cosmological Argument presents an argument for the existence of a necessary being, it is not without its weaknesses and criticisms that undermine its validity.