171k views
4 votes
In a comment to this recent question of mine, somebody used the phrase, complete understanding.

Without necessarily answering the linked question (i.e. without defining understanding), what is the difference between an incomplete understanding and a complete understanding?

User Blagalin
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

A complete understanding involves having comprehensive knowledge and comprehension of a topic, concept, or subject matter, while an incomplete understanding means having limited or partial knowledge.

Step-by-step explanation:

A complete understanding differs from an incomplete understanding in that a complete understanding means having comprehensive knowledge or comprehension of a topic, concept, or subject matter. It entails having a thorough grasp of all the relevant information, details, and nuances, and being able to explain and apply that knowledge effectively. On the other hand, an incomplete understanding means having limited or partial knowledge or comprehension, with gaps in understanding or misconceptions about the topic.

For example, in the context of history, someone with a complete understanding of a historical event would not only know the basic facts and dates, but also understand the causes, consequences, and various interpretations of that event. They would have a deep comprehension of the context, significance, and multiple perspectives related to the event. On the other hand, someone with an incomplete understanding might only have a superficial knowledge of the event, lacking a comprehensive understanding of its broader implications and historical significance.

Having a complete understanding requires continuous learning, critical thinking, and active engagement with the subject matter. It involves seeking out different sources of information, evaluating evidence and arguments, making connections between different concepts, and being able to articulate and apply that knowledge in various contexts.

User Samuel Colvin
by
8.1k points