216k views
0 votes
A protein is a component of the presynaptic terminal is colocalisation with a presynaptic marker (e.g. synaptophysin) sufficient evidence? Or should there be other forms of evidence to back this statement up?

User Akuma
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Colocalization with synaptophysin is strong evidence of a protein's presynaptic localization but not definitive. Multiple forms of evidence should be used to confirm presynaptic localization, from immunocytochemistry to electron microscopy and functional assays.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the study of neuronal function and structure, it is critical to use multiple forms of evidence to confirm the localization of a protein within certain cellular components, such as the presynaptic element. While colocalization with a presynaptic marker like synaptophysin is strong evidence, it's not definitive on its own. Additional methods to support this include immunocytochemistry with other known presynaptic markers, electron microscopy to directly observe the presynaptic terminals, and functional assays to confirm the role of the protein in presynaptic functions such as neurotransmitter release or vesicle cycling.

The neurotransmitter is packaged in vesicles within the presynaptic terminal and is released into the synaptic cleft during neurotransmission. It then binds to receptor proteins on the postsynaptic element to elicit a response. The sequence is completed with neurotransmitter elimination or re-uptake to terminate the signal.

User Mohamed Badr
by
7.4k points