Question

I've recently had some challenging experiences with a friend. Every time we see each other we're drawn into heated debate. Previously I thought I was right, and my friend was wrong, and I desired to help them correct their thinking. Now I suspect that my friend and I reside in different value systems that are compelling from the inside, but mutually unintelligible. Let's say I am currently residing in value system A and my friend resides in value system B. The twist that I am struggling with is that B is more permissible from A than A is from B. I think my friend might have more life satisfaction seeing things from A, but ultimately it's ok if they don't... no skin off my back. But my friend seems deeply concerned about value system A - they seem to think that it's an injustice for me to hold these values. If I cannot reside in both at the same time, and I have compelling evidence that value system B is at least plausible, do I have a duty to explore their alternative way of thinking? I'm curious for arguments for and against such a duty. Reasons For Exploring Alternate Value Systems Data That You Have Don't Match With Your Value System As always, keep data at top. May be your observations tell you that you are giving more value to something which should be given less value, at expense of less value to something that should be given more value. Or that you are being too tight or too loose in general. See, what works. Thats the part of data that is relevant here. To Convince Others You cannot really point out mistakes in other systems unless you have understood them. A teacher is supposed to know more than his pupils about what he is teaching. I'm not sure there is a philosophical answer to this so I can only respond based on my personal experience. I have been interested in human values related issues for many decades, so much so that in my retirement I have chosen to write hard science fiction novellas and short stories about AI based social robots in the near future where the existential and social issues related to human values are the main theme. Fifteen hundred pages to date. Please read the following with the understanding these are only my opinions, not something I claim to be "the truth". You face a daunting challenge because I believe that human values are the basis of our identity. They are the basis of everything we think, say and do. If we took away all your values who would you be? Given this, when our values are challenged it represents an existential danger, a threat, so we defend them at all costs and they are understandably almost impossible to change. Making this more complicated there are values at the species, social and personal levels and some are genetic and some extra-genetic (learned). If someone has personal values at the genetic level (twin studies) you can imagine how hard those will be to change. Given that many advanced psychotherapies attempt to change an individuals values, and yet often fail, consider the task at hand. I would suggest the best you can do is to come to anunderstandingof each other’s views. Evenacceptanceis normally a bridge too far as far as values differences go. You use the word "duty" and that is also a values related term and subject to philosophical debate in itself so lets put that aside. One might say you are negotiating with your friend regarding your value differences. At one point in my working life I was involved in negotiations at the corporate level so of course I was sent for training. The two books that are relevant to your question are "Getting To Yes" "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People". Only the chapter titled "Seek First To Understand, Then To Be Understood" of the 7 Habits book is of interest :// I was sent to multi-day, out of town training seminars based on these books. Borrow them from the library and have a look if you fee so inclined. The key thing to notice with regards to these books is that your approach must be structured and you will have to learn how to do that.Because most people listen with the intent to reply they do not listen as empathically or as deeply as they might. "Active Listening" is related skill you might look up and investigate and it will provide you with additional structured methods. Best of luck. a) Engage in open dialogue to understand their perspective better.

b) Seek common ground without necessarily adopting their values.
c) Reflect on how their values might complement or challenge your own.
d) Consider the impact of exploring their values on your relationship.

Answer 1

Exploring different value systems can lead to personal growth and better mutual understanding and is not a duty but a choice based on curiosity and desire for broader perspective.

Step-by-step explanation:

Exploring alternative value systems is a significant process crucial for personal growth and mutual understanding. When encountering a value system different from your own, several points merit reflection and could potentially encourage someone to delve into that alternative perspective. Mutual understanding is vital to navigate disagreements in values, which can be achieved by exploring different value systems. Engaging in this exploration allows for a deeper comprehension of the evidence supporting the alternative system and enhances your capacity to discourse meaningfully with others who hold those values.

In the context of your situation, it's important to consider that while you may find your friend's value system intriguing, adopting it is not a matter of duty but a choice driven by curiosity and the desire for a broader understanding. Exploring alternative values might reveal internal inconsistencies within one's own beliefs or offer fresh perspectives that lead to more grounded and rational thought processes. Reflect on whether these values challenge or complement your own, and consider the impact such exploration could have on your friendships and your own life decisions.