Question

As John Yossarian's advocate, how would you rebut his Catch-22 using only logic?

Answer 1

To rebut Catch-22 using logic, one can analyze the premise's logical validity, counter it with rational arguments, and propose alternative solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Catch-22, John Yossarian faces a dilemma where he cannot escape dangerous military missions due to the paradoxical policy of Catch-22. To rebut this, one can use logic:

1. Identify the primary premise: Catch-22 states that concern for one's own life is a form of insanity, and therefore, pilots are required to fly dangerous missions.
2. Examine the premise's logical validity: Any policy that forces individuals to engage in life-threatening situations, without considering their well-being, is inherently flawed. It fails to uphold the duty of a government to protect its citizens.
3. Counter the premise: Point out that sane individuals have self-preservation instincts, and it is rational to prioritize one's safety. Refusing to jeopardize one's life does not indicate insanity; rather, it demonstrates a rational response to a dangerous situation.
4. Consider alternative solutions: Advocate for the military to develop a more reasonable policy that balances the need for military personnel with the responsibility to prioritize their well-being.

By using logic and highlighting the flawed logic and consequences of Catch-22, one can effectively rebut the policy.