Final answer:
The idea that something coming from nothing is less intuitive than something existing eternally can be attributed to the acceptance of the principle that nothing can come from nothing in philosophy, the exploration of philosophical and cosmological theories that allow for the possibility of eternal existence, and the influence of culture and beliefs on individuals' perception of what is intuitive or logical.
Step-by-step explanation:
The idea that something coming from nothing is seen as less intuitive than something existing eternally can be attributed to a few reasons. Firstly, the principle that nothing can come from nothing has been accepted in philosophy for centuries. It suggests that there must be a cause or source for everything that exists. Therefore, the concept of something coming into existence from nothing goes against this principle and may seem less intuitive.
Secondly, the idea of something existing eternally has been explored in various philosophical and cosmological theories, such as the notion of an eternal and necessary agency or energy. This notion allows for the possibility that something has always existed and does not require a specific creator or origin outside of itself. It provides a framework that is more familiar and easier to grasp than the idea of something arising from nothing.
Lastly, the intellectual environment and cultural background of individuals can also influence their perception of what is intuitive or logical. In many societies, the concept of a creator or an eternal existence has been ingrained in religious or cultural beliefs. Therefore, it may be more familiar and intuitive for people to think of something existing eternally rather than something coming from nothing.