Final answer:
A deontic logic informed by Rawlsian/Arendtian considerations would likely favor plural quantifiers to accommodate reasonable pluralism and the diversity of perspectives, aligning with the moral and legal philosophies of John Rawls and Hannah Arendt.
Step-by-step explanation:
Should a deontic logic informed by Rawlsian/Arendtian considerations use plural quantifiers? This intriguing question touches upon legal and moral philosophy, referencing the work of John Rawls and Hannah Arendt. Rawlsian theory is rooted in reasonable pluralism, implying that a just society must accommodate a plurality of competing reasonable doctrines and the inevitability of reasonable disagreement among citizens committed to finding fair terms of cooperation. Therefore, a deontic logic that takes into account Rawls' veil of ignorance would likely favor plural quantifiers to ensure principles of justice that can be universally applied.
Hannah Arendt's contributions to philosophy, especially her views on the banality of evil and the importance of political action, reinforce the idea that diverse perspectives are critical in moral reasoning. When considering the Rawlsian conception of justice and Arendt's emphasis on individual agency within the political sphere, a deontic logic informed by their considerations would align with plural quantifiers to capture the diverse conditions and perspectives of all agents involved.