Final answer:
Musical formalism and game-theoretic formalism serve different purposes in different fields; one is not necessarily better than the other but rather more applicable depending on the context.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering whether musical formalism is a better version of formalism than game-theoretic formalism in the philosophy of mathematics, it's important to note that these forms of formalism serve different purposes and are rooted in different disciplines. Musical formalism pertains to the arts, particularly the conceptualization of music's value being determined by its form and the experience it delivers. On the other hand, game-theoretic formalism is related to logic and mathematics, focusing on the strategic interaction between decision-making agents and often utilizing mathematical formulations.
Musical formalism evaluates an artwork's aesthetic value based on its form and compositional elements, whereas game-theoretic formalism evaluates the strategies and outcomes of games, which could be metaphorical for decision-making processes or real-world scenarios. As per the information provided that relates to Heidegger's view on authenticity in art and phenomenology, the choice between musical formalism and game-theoretic formalism isn't a matter of one being better than the other, but rather which is more applicable to a given context or field of study.