Final answer:
To improve upon cherry-picked information, one should seek out additional, verifiable evidence that provides a balanced view and be aware of biases. This includes assessing the source, evaluating credibility, and cross-referencing with other research. Different academic fields require distinct types of evidence to support claims.
Step-by-step explanation:
To tackle cherry-picked information, a robust body of evidence is required. Evidence needs to be comprehensive and representative of the whole picture, not just selective parts that support a particular view. When considering how much and what kind of evidence is essential to improve on cherry-picked information, it is crucial to assess the source of the information, the ability to verify the evidence, and to be aware of any potential bias.
Improvement on cherry-picked data involves seeking additional evidence that challenges the selected view, to provide a more balanced perspective. It includes comparing evidence against other findings in the field, evaluating the credibility of the sources, and examining if the evidence is corroborated by other research. This helps in forming a well-rounded understanding of the topic.
If cherry-picked information is the best available, it may not be wrong but could be incomplete. Thus, drawing conclusions based on such evidence should be done with caution. It is also pertinent to consult a variety of sources and researchers to mitigate the risks of adopting a biased or narrow perspective. In academia, different types of evidence and support are mandated depending on the field of study, which dictates the rigor and form of proof required to substantiate a claim.