114k views
0 votes
Alexander’s march into India has been celebrated as a great achievement because of its boldness and as a terrible mistake because it led his troops to mutiny, and he died not long after. What do you think of this move? How might things have played out differently if Alexander hadn’t tried to extend his empire in this way?

a) Alexander's move was ambitious but contributed to his empire's downfall.
b) Alexander's strategy was futile, hindering his conquests elsewhere.
c) His move impacted morale but didn’t alter the empire’s fate significantly.
d) Avoiding India would have prolonged Alexander's reign but not altered its end.

User Paul Rubel
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Alexander's move into India was ambitious, but ultimately led to his empire's downfall. Avoiding India may have prolonged his reign, but the empire's end would likely have been unchanged.

Step-by-step explanation:

Alexander's move into India can be seen as ambitious but ultimately contributed to his empire's downfall. By pushing his troops too hard and venturing into unknown territory, Alexander faced a mutiny and eventually died soon after. If he hadn't tried to extend his empire in this way, his reign may have been prolonged, but the ultimate end of his empire would likely have remained the same.

User Maricela
by
7.8k points